2017年5月25日星期四

Is free society really free?

Longing for freedom is human nature, but full freedom means that you do not abide by the rules. Especially for the current society, there is no difference between those who do not keep the rules and the beast. And this is the human and the beast different place, we understand the rules, we keep the rules. Are we not free?
I think that freedom is relative, the main question to see how you want to understand, you think you can not say that they want to say, do what they want is not free, it is wrong. Individual freedom can not harm society, that is, it can not harm others. If the damage to others, society will limit the freedom of the individual, so that he felt "not free". You live in this world, human beings are social animals, you are not a living in this world you have to take care of other people's feelings.
Even if you are in a free society is even more so. In a free society, individuals will form volunteer groups, including free markets and communist societies. The United States is a free market, and China is a communist society, but it is difficult to say that the citizens of that country are not free. I think the country is to give some freedom to the people, but can not give too much, just like the British now, the election out of the EU, the entire country's economy has been a certain trauma, and in another vote, Most people have voted to join the EU. This is the result of the people too free.
We can have relative freedom, not absolute freedom. Especially in this free society now, relative freedom is the most perfect result we can get.

Economic gap? No, this is human economic characteristics.


There's evidence that people don't mind economic gaps as much as pundits think they do.”of course.Because ordinary people do not have time and have no ability to think about the economic gap.
The economic gap is based on the income gap between individuals or groups in a society. But I do not understand that this economic gap in human society has long existed in the era of barter, that is, in the human race near the starting point of the position, the economic gap already exists in human civilization.
Throughout the history of mankind, there have been so many geniuses in all fields, but this problem has always existed in this economic civilization system established by mankind. So the Soviet Union and China have tried to solve this problem, but the result? The Soviet Union is comparable to the United States one of the world's strongest countries, actually a direct economic collapse, the state decomposition. China is also starving to thousands of people. However, this problem is still not resolved.
History is always circulating, whether in modern times, or in ancient times, the country or the kingdom of the destruction is due to excessive economic disparities caused. The richer the rich, the poorer the poor. As it is now. But the economic gap in different societies and different historical periods will change, such as the war, prices must fly the same to rise, but the value of money is falling. The same is true of peacetime, but the speed is much slower than in the war.
Although this historical issue can not be avoided, but it can be controlled to a certain extent. Like money prices, is the money more valuable. Increase the income of civilians, and so on.
In fact, the larger economic inequality will hinder economic growth this view is not correct, because it will take years to see the improvement of economic gap in economic growth and development.

2017年5月14日星期日

The difference between US medical insurance and Chinese medical insurance

 The United States has a wide variety of medical insurance, often confused the initial applicant unintelligible, for students to set the student health insurance, but also for the rich set of unlimited real insurance for private insurance.  This is very similar to China.
In the United States, most of the rich have a private doctor, in any part of the world to see the cost of all the "real newspaper", on condition that the monthly payment of expensive insurance. Of course, this is nothing for the rich man. But for the poor, the US health insurance is quite unfriendly. The poor can only find those low insurance premium insurance institutions, to the designated hospital. Those who make ends meet may not attend any medical insurance, and if they have to wait, they can go to the long queues of public hospitals and fill in a lengthy and cumbersome form to obtain a free prescription. And as far as I know, the American ambulance is super super expensive, do a car, you may want more than $ 1,000. 30 years ago, ambulance to send patients to the hospital are generally free of charge, the cost borne by the taxpayer, as a municipal service project, or by the volunteers to provide services. Today, as with other aspects of the US health care system, most ambulance services are commercial, leading to a sharp rise in US health care costs. Often, the patient first takes a low cost ambulance and receives an expensive emergency room.
Compared with the United States emergency care work, China's health care system by some experts as the reform of China's social security system, the most failed one. The following are the same as the "
Currently circulated in China, a verbal meditation is: do not get sick, lack of lack of money. At present, the fairness of medical services in China is declining and inefficient. But also in a variety of ways to make money, completely contrary to the basic laws of medical and health services. Some of the VOA listeners talked about China's health care reform in the audience hotline, and some even miss the Mao Zedong era barefoot doctors, public health care, cooperative medical system.
In China, the doctor is expensive, difficult to see a doctor of the Chinese people to become the first focus of attention. It looks like the situation around the world is about the same. Fortunately, China's ambulance is free, but recently seems to have a new policy introduced, China's free ambulance has to become history.
China is now a lot of medical insurance is a lot of problems, and now many people simply can not go to the hospital, and some Chinese doctors like to instigate the patient to buy expensive medicine, a lot of expensive medicine or even not cure the disease. It is because the government invested in medical institutions, supply capacity is weak, in turn the medical institutions into the market so that their own to adapt to the market, self-financing, so the hospital has no way, in order to avoid the closure, it can only improve drug prices. That is, this way, leading to poor people see more and more difficult to see a doctor. And the difference between China's treatment is very serious, such as you come to Shanghai, in Beijing, Beijing is more expensive to see a doctor than in Beijing. And there is a large gap between the different groups of people and the medical level in different areas, resulting in a lot of people do not participate in medical insurance.

2017年4月29日星期六

The History And Challenge Of International Terrorism

Freddy Liu 
Mr.DeMeritt 
English 4 
April 27th 2017  
  
The History And Challenge Of International Terrorism  
Introduction: 
Good morning everyone, my name is Freddy Liu, and today I will talk about "The History And Challenge Of International Terrorism" 
Why do I choose this topic, because of the frequent attacks of terrorists in recent months, so I want to let you know about terrorism. 
History: international and general 
The term "terrorism" first appeared during the French Revolution of the eighteenth century when the ruling party executed people to intimidate their enemies 
Terrorism has become one of the biggest enemies of all mankind, and the eradication of terrorism has become a common task for all mankind in the new century. In this world there is nothing more hateful than terrorism, and there is nothing more confusing than terrorism. The world has been fighting terrorism for ever. The official terrorist organizations recognized by all countries used to be AL Qaeda. But now that the leader of al Qaeda Osama bin Laden, was killed in 2011, by the US military, other terrorist organizations like ISIS has started 
Present day: 
Global :  
Terrorist organization continue to exist globally because of the believe that "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter". Terrorists still has somewhere to go. While almost everyone opposes terrorism on a global basis, it is a shame that there is no global consensus on anti-terrorism operations. 
In July 2016. On French  National Day in France, a terrorist drove a truck into a crowd killing 80 and injuring more than 50  people. 
In 2014, in the Kunming Railway Station in China a terrorist group used knifes and booms to kill 31 and injure 141 people. 
The USA also has many terrorist attacks,in June 2016, in Florida, a terrorist went into a bar and used a gun to kill 50 peopleand injure 53 and then killed himself. ISIS claimed responsibly and labeled the killer as "martyr". 
 Also in December 2015, on California another terrorist attack occurred when a couple shot and killed 14 people and injured 21. 
Fortunately, in Yuba City we have not had any terrorist attacks. 
Judeo/christian perspective: 
Although the religion is advise people to good, but if you really know history, you will know the religion usually is not make community more peaceful, is the begining of fight, killing and war. 
The first cause of the conflict in religion is the exclusion of the heretic: only I am right and others are wrong. How sommer like terrorism.  
To peaceful treatment unbeliever is a new mission of religion. Now Buddhism and Christianity are doing well, especially the Buddhism. 
So let religion and government are together like mixing extremes and violence. The unity of the church and the state means extreme violence, evil and terror. Whether history or now, Islam and government go the most recent, which is why so many terrorists from Islam. 
Of course, my personal view is that you can completely eliminate these terrorists, even the hope is small. Because last time global consensus is in 1984 for "Human Genome Project". 
Thank you for listening, I'm ended.